hey@talentsmoothie.com
Call us on +44 (0) 207 127 4741

leadership

Learning from past presidents

by admin on October 11, 2008

 

In this moving talk by Doris Kearns Godwin she talks about Abraham Lincoln and Lyndon Johnson and what the 2008 presidential candidates can learn from them. She says that Lincoln’s greatness consisted of “the integrity of his character and moral fibre of his being”. The lessons from this talk are excellent lessons in life as well as leadership. They are themes that are often talked about when describing great leaders. In contrast, she speaks of Lyndon Johnson and his focus on work, power and individual success.

Someone once said that the one thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history. I really hope that the future US president and the global financial world learns from history and that they take a leaf out of Abraham Lincoln’s book too.

Sally

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page

{ 0 comments }

Something about American companies?

by admin on September 12, 2008

I have been researching organisations and their cultures for more than ten years and I am fascinated by the fact that the organisations that are heralded as truly innovative, vibrant and exciting are few and far between. There is so much knowledge out there about how to create forward-thinking and successful organisations, companies spend millions each year on consultants to help them with this pursuit – yet I would argue that the list of those who can be truly admired is not very long.

It is of course very difficult to really know what a company is really like without working in it, Reading books. articles and case studies is not enough, Nor is attendance at conferences where company representatives speak about their success and how they achieved it. I have read and heard lots of very positive stories about companies who I doubt could live up to those stories.  Corporate PR machines are alive and kicking.

Notwithstanding that, the following companies are probably justifiably admired and certainly very attractive to prospective investors, customers and employees:

  • Google
  • Apple
  • SAS Institute
  • Southwest Airlines
  • Ritz-Carlton
  • Virgin
  • WL Gore

All of these companies appear to have innovation in their history and in their blood stream.   They don’t have to engage in the so-called ‘war for talent’, they have people queuing up to work for them.

Most of them are American. Why is that? Is it to do with the American culture, the best of which is positive,  optimistic, boundary-breaking and can-do.  It strikes me when working with American colleagues that they focus on what they can do, not what they can’t, they celebrate success and push for more and they don’t consider modesty to be a virtue.

In contrast, some would say that the worst of British culture means that people famously favour the underdog, play down success, stick with tried and tested ways of doing things and are conscious of their place in the prevailing hierarchy’.

Of course, generalisations are dangerous but there does seem to be something worth thinking about here. It is common for business leaders to ask themselves what they can learn from other companies, it is a good question. The context cannot be overlooked though – national culture is a crucially important part of that context and can undoubtedly shed some light on differences that make a difference.

Sally

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page

{ 0 comments }

 

Leaders are the most important asset a company has. How we train leaders and what we train them in is going to become vital in the global competitive economy. Think about what happens when poor leadership occurs – companies can be brought down. What happened at Enron was about greed, unethical behaviour and a lack of responsibility.

But leadership training is not just about avoiding bad things happening. It is about creating organisations that achieve great strides forward in their particular fields. Think of Google, Virgin, South West Airlines, SAS Institute. All of them are very successful, have their own unique cultures and are in different ways breaking the mould. And of course all of them have great leaders. They are all different but they are certainly not plodding people who care more about conformity than creativity.

I wonder how many such leaders the multi-million dollar leadership development industry produces each year. So much time and effort is quite rightly put into training our leaders. But are we doing a good enough job? And what if we are not?

In this video clip Patrick Awuah talks about the importance of educating young people to be leaders in Africa. He believes that the education of future leaders needs to encompass an exploration of ethics, learning about dealing with ambiguity, a move away from the rote learning of the past and an emphasis on thinking.

This clip raised many questions for me around what we are teaching our leaders and how successful we are being in increasing the overall leadership capability. Awuah quotes one of his students on an email he received: “I am thinking”. How many of our leaders truly think and question themselves and the world versus repeating what they have always done in ways that they have always done it. How many leaders understand that to really think about something means to examine their own values and principles as they underpin what we think, what we believe and what we do.

I would say that we are failing to even aspire to, let alone achieve, the standards of leadership excellence that Awuah refers to. My evidence for this is the amount of activity going on in companies to increase employee engagement, reduce turnover and attract talented people. Problems in all of these areas can almost always be tracked back to inadequate leadership. Great leaders create meaning, set standards, have strong values and ethics, drive for superior performance and thus create cultures where people are highly engaged and want to stay.

Excellent leaders want to be challenged, they want people that push, question the status quo and think for themselves. They understand that to compete in this fast changing world they need their people to be open minded, learning new ways and ditching what is no longer useful. The good news is that the workforce is changing: Generation Y have arrived and they are much more inclined than their older colleagues to behave in those ways.

Generation Y present a huge opportunity to organisations. Yet, too many bosses are still thinking of them as a challenge and are still expending a lot of energy getting them to conform. The old model of leadership still prevails. It looks like this and it is frustrating.

  • · The boss needs to be respected for his position in the hierarchy not for his contribution
  • · The more junior you are the less you are assumed to know
  • · It is not the done thing to challenge senior managers
  • · It is not the done thing to challenge prevailing practices such as 9 to 5 working (of course it makes sense that we still work those hours that were necessary in post-industrial factory settings!)
  • · The boss’s job is more of a monitor than a mentor

Make no mistake, it is not just Gen Y who are frustrated by this style of leadership (if you can call it leadership), lots of people are. The difference is that Gen Y will are much less likely to put up with it, they will leave.

We need to step up the quality of our leadership training. We need to tackle the tough and thorny issues of values and meaning as well as the essential high performance leadership competency development. Business schools and training consultancies tend to concentrate on the latter because it is easier to do and it lends itself to boxes being seen to be ticked. But running a business is not a tick box activity. It is complex and challenging. Having spent the past year developing a leadership model and development programme that tackles the tricky bits I know it is not at all easy. But we have to try. If we don’t then we are doing a great disservice to our current and future leaders for whom skills and behavioural training will simply not be enough to thrive in this increasingly demanding business world.

Sally

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page

{ 3 comments }

Gen Y and ‘Office’ politics

by SimonWalker on April 3, 2008

Post image for Gen Y and ‘Office’ politics

One of our mantras at the moment is that when it comes to work, Gen Ys appear to be demanding what most Gen Xers and Boomers have always wanted but were ’conditioned’ not to expect.

It would appear that being free from the ‘leadership’ of David Brent type characters comes into this category.

We came across a great quote last week from one of our Gen Y panellists at a conference we were presenting at.  Talking about ‘The Office’ sit-com, she commented that when she first saw the programme she really thought it was a joke…

Sadly, now she has worked in a few organisations, she knows it is far to close to reality.

Why on earth do Gen X and the Boomers put up with such nonsense?  Thank goodness it looks like Gen Y won’t.

Simon

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page

{ 0 comments }

Gen Y and leadership

by Sally Bibb on March 25, 2008

352439602_d22444b389_m

Generation Y’s different values and attitudes are causing tensions in the corporate world and the military too.  Gen Ys are natural networkers, they do not respond well to command and control styles of leadership. This actually poses a huge opportunity to those organisations who see the benefit in collaborative working. And there are an increasing number who do.

I was recently talking to a senior manager in a big media company who told me that the only way they would be able to reach their high revenue targets is if people start to work together more effectively. The challenge is for older managers who are used to a hierarchical way of working.  They want to keep control and feel uncomfortable with the idea of encouraging their staff to cross organisational boundaries to work together. They simply do not want to do things differently.  Why would they? They have always worked in a hierarchically-based way.

I have been working with my co-directors to design a leadership programme that helps such managers. It is desperately needed. It is surprising how much leadership development is still based on outdated assumptions. It is also surprising how few leadership programmes  take account of the new context within which leaders have to operate.

The military have of course had to respond to new contexts in recent years. One of these has been the threat of terrorist organisations that operate on a non-conventional, networked model.  I was interested to know whether the military were thinking about how they need to change in light of the external changes. As let’s face it, if they can get to grips with a new kind of leadership anyone should be able to. And sure enough, they are taking the issue very seriously. This excellent article describes the changes that they need to make and the opportunities that this affords them. Businesses would do well to take a leaf out of their book.

Sally Bibb

Click on pen to Use a Highlighter on this page

{ 1 comment }